WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED WITH THE POLITICS OF ACCELERATIONISM?
Reading Ben Noys' recent note on accelerationism, one gets the feeling that many are starting to return (some more reluctantly than others) to the original sources of accelerationism to discover that, after so much fucking with L/Acc and R/Acc, the real fun was in the original accelerationism. Ultimately, perhaps we've been misunderstanding the "speculative turn." Why do we speak so readily of overcoming the framework of language and the framework of the subject (typical tasks of postmodernism and poststructuralism), yet struggle so much to talk about overcoming the framework of human politics? Why is it harder to imagine the end of human politics than the end of capitalism? Because, indeed, however many post-apocalyptic scenarios we may dream up (including the end of capitalism), none is as apocalyptic as the end of human centrality. This is the terminal station beyond the well-known ends of history, culture, civilizations, economic systems and so on. The end of h...